Asrock H270M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H270M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '19 at 22:50
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7350K-$42
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 94
1-Core 134
2-Core 190
83% 139 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 373
50% 373 Pts
64-Core 367
23% 367 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
ASRock(1849 5912) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.65% Terrible
Lighting 8.97
Reflection 13.2
Parallax 8.66
7% 10.3 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 18.7
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.65%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 120GB-$69
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E7FM04.C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 663 512 765 648 640 593 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 1,035
Write 683
Mixed 544
SusWrite 637
162% 724 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 54.4
212% 84 MB/s
DQ Read 522
DQ Write 682
DQ Mixed 512
412% 572 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 172%
Great: 185%
Mushkin MKNSSDTR250GB 250GB
145GB free
Firmware: O1126A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 85 83 83 84 84 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 470
Mixed 424
SusWrite 115
85% 382 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 57
183% 69.4 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 262
219% 316 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 100%
Great: 98%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 997GB
482GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 475 453 484 484 485 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 494
Mixed 470
SusWrite 473
110% 489 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 64.1
214% 77.9 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 133%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
81% Excellent
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 23.6
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 25.7
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 81%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H270M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H270M-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $214
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback