PC Recoil III

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics72.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive278% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPC Recoil III  (all builds)
MotherboardTongFang GK7CP7S
Memory58.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '19 at 11:05
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 77.8
1-Core 127
2-Core 254
83% 153 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 800
79% 647 Pts
64-Core 1,032
64% 1,032 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile)
Device(1D05 105D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.5% Very good
Lighting 85.5
Reflection 102
Parallax 93.6
70% 93.6 fps
MRender 126
Gravity 84.2
Splatting 82.4
78% 97.6 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 99%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1D05 105D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6618
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.81% Terrible
Lighting 7.03
Reflection 91.1
Parallax 7.56
6% 35.2 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 14
9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.81%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$218
944GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2056 1704 1808 1775 1845 1321 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
278% Outstanding
Read 1,305
Write 1,100
Mixed 1,124
SusWrite 1,752
298% 1,320 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 63.1
204% 71.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,281
DQ Write 1,183
DQ Mixed 1,258
936% 1,240 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 278%
Great: 371%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 23.5
84% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 26.5
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Recoil III Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: PC Recoil III

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $149
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback