Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics80.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive288% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime6.5 Days
Run DateMar 26 '19 at 18:38
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 144
2-Core 287
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 793
84% 674 Pts
64-Core 789
49% 789 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.3% Excellent
Lighting 98.4
Reflection 113
Parallax 94.8
80% 102 fps
MRender 97.6
Gravity 95.5
Splatting 101
80% 98 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
344GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1135 1138 628 625 627 624 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
288% Outstanding
Read 2,593
Write 2,341
Mixed 1,554
SusWrite 796
406% 1,821 MB/s
4K Read 71.3
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 99.5
341% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 73.5
DQ Write 1,257
DQ Mixed 105
249% 478 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 288%
Great: 340%
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550
226GB free
Firmware: 8EV10171 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 932 938 942 938 802 787 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 1,137
Write 947
Mixed 640
SusWrite 890
202% 903 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 227
4K Mixed 57.8
260% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,193
DQ Write 940
DQ Mixed 57.9
318% 730 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 225%
Great: 230%
WD Black 5TB (2015)-$71
4.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 181 184 185 188 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 238
Mixed 121
SusWrite 186
130% 177 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
465% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
397GB free, PID 0210
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 74 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 73.2
Write 72
Mixed 31
SusWrite 73.7
83% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 49%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
557GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 102 101 104 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 98.3
Write 96.7
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 102
112% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-2400C15-8GVR F4-3000C16-8GTZR F4-2400C15-8GVR F4-3000C16-8GTZR 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 25.1
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 33.5
SC Mixed 26.3
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 59.4
67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 808 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $709
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback