Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141125
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateMar 26 '19 at 13:42
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 70.9
2-Core 126
60% 94.8 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 272
31% 245 Pts
64-Core 279
17% 279 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Nvidia(10DE 104A) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.79% Terrible
Lighting 2.27
Reflection 2.54
Parallax 1.81
2% 2.21 fps
MRender 2.33
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 1.74
2% 2.11 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.79%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
519GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 34 21 61 86 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 113
Write 117
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 55.2
58% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 107%
Generic USB CF Reader 1GB
0GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
1.18% Terrible
Read 2.5
Write 1.7
Mixed 2
SusWrite 1.9
3% 2.02 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.18%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.4% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 9
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 8.3
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0 Builds (Compare 1,728 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback