Samsung DP700A3D/DM700A3D/DB701A3D/DP700A7D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung DP700A3D/DM700A3D/DB701A3D/DP700A7D  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG DP700A3D-A01US
Memory3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130807
Uptime3 Days
Run DateMar 25 '19 at 23:54
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470T-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 68.2
2-Core 119
57% 90.3 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 221
30% 222 Pts
64-Core 222
14% 222 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Sanyo(144D B091) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.73% Terrible
Lighting 1.77
Reflection 1.77
Parallax 1.34
1% 1.63 fps
MRender 3.62
Gravity 1.07
Splatting 3.48
2% 2.72 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.73%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 1TB-$100
939GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427ANR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 241 242 240 243 246 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
78% Very good
Read 257
Write 237
Mixed 238
SusWrite 241
55% 243 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 42.6
140% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 184
144% 198 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773EB0-CK0 M471B5273EB0-CK0 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.9
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 14.7
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 52%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DP700A3D/DM700A3D/DB701A3D/DP700A7D Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung DP700A3D/DM700A3D/DB701A3D/DP700A7D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $198
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback