ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Predator G9-593

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Acer Predator G9-593 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Mustang2_SKS
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180302
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 24 '19 at 20:40
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76% Very good	Memory 84.9 1-Core 108 2-Core 206 76% 133 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 548 56% 455 Pts	64-Core 536 33% 536 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% Acer(1025 1131) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	17.6% Very poor	Lighting 19.9 Reflection 22.9 Parallax 18.6 16% 20.5 fps	MRender 28.3 Gravity 19.6 Splatting 26 20% 24.6 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HMHQ-00000 256GB 10,917 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 178GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAV2100Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 307 309 309 293 297 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 483 Write 467 Mixed 358 SusWrite 316 91% 406 MB/s	4K Read 35.8 4K Write 82.6 4K Mixed 46.9 158% 55.1 MB/s	DQ Read 365 DQ Write 316 DQ Mixed 333 252% 338 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 116%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 184GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 905 661 662 660 661 657 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	259% Outstanding	Read 2,159 Write 1,844 Mixed 1,278 SusWrite 701 334% 1,496 MB/s	4K Read 62.1 4K Write 143 4K Mixed 81.9 275% 95.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1064 DQ Write 917 DQ Mixed 994 744% 992 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 259% Great: 340%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 160GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 86 86 86 86 86 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	60% Above average	Read 124 Write 121 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 84.8 64% 88.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2400C14S4/8G ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 16GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	MC Read 26.4 MC Write 27.3 MC Mixed 20.8 71% 24.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 27.1 SC Mixed 22.3 62% 21.8 GB/s	Latency 72 56% 72 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Predator G9-593 Builds (Compare 367 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 49%

Yacht

Desktop

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

System: Acer Predator G9-593

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	216x
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	132x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	12x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	202x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	160x
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	3x

SSD
CV1-8B128 128GBLiteonBench 69%, 9,472 samples	47x
CV1-8B256 256GBLiteonBench 77%, 8,101 samples	39x
Raid 0 Volume 256GBIntelBench 120%, 13,747 samples	31x

RAM
ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 11,019 samples	138x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	58x
HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 1x16GBHynixBench 40%, 22,543 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback