Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMar 24 '19 at 16:55
Run Duration278 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 94.9
2-Core 190
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 389
52% 390 Pts
64-Core 389
24% 389 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
Gigabyte(1458 36FF) 2GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
9.06% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 9.42
Parallax 11.8
8% 10.4 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 12.2
Splatting 13.1
11% 13 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.06%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,877
Write 5,769
Mixed 6,115
1,394% 6,254 MB/s
4K Read 505
4K Write 210
4K Mixed 268
1,219% 327 MB/s
DQ Read 1,475
DQ Write 441
DQ Mixed 715
590% 877 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
139GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 319 316 315 316 318 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 430
Write 401
Mixed 370
SusWrite 330
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 56.1
186% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 311
235% 316 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 110%
Great: 124%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
681GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 96 96 97 98 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 114
Write 95.5
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 96.2
70% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 76%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
225GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 98 98 98 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
56% Above average
Read 97
Write 47.3
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 97.8
56% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56%
Great: 62%
WDC WD16 00AAJB-56WRA0 160GB
62GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 49 50 50 50 49 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.7% Poor
Read 70.7
Write 67.3
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 49.1
74% 56.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 27%
BUFFALO External HDD 1TB
751GB free, PID 0184
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 27.5
Write 37
Mixed 33.3
SusWrite 42
50% 35 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 60%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
343GB free, PID 0210
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 108 109 109 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 101
Write 94.3
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 108
113% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 44%
SAMSUNG HD322HJ 320GB
297GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 49 50 50 50 49 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.9% Below average
Read 103
Write 48
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 49.2
79% 64.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
115% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 36%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
4GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.7 3.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.81% Terrible
Read 18.3
Write 3.5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 3.6
7% 6.97 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.81%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
76.8% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 25.7
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 22.6
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 14,078 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $891
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback