Acer Predator G3-572

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator G3-572  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Sienta_KLS
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '19 at 14:36
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 76.2
1-Core 106
2-Core 214
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 595
62% 500 Pts
64-Core 594
37% 594 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 118B) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1935
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Lighting 68.9
Reflection 71.6
Parallax 59.1
56% 66.5 fps
MRender 67.7
Gravity 60.6
Splatting 64
52% 64.1 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 4.2 21 57 42 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 447
Write 345
Mixed 230
SusWrite 81.9
61% 276 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 25.5
4K Mixed 12.8
64% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 85.1
DQ Mixed 41.3
47% 80.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 55%
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
118GB free
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 92 150 152 152 152 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 447
Write 336
Mixed 254
SusWrite 176
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 19.5
73% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 83.3
DQ Mixed 42.2
47% 80.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G3B1 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
42.7% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 12.5
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 14.2
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 88
46% 88 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G3-572 Builds (Compare 1,411 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G3-572

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback