| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 37% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 76.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus P8P67 EVO (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20121101 |
| Uptime | 0.7 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 25 '16 at 08:30 |
| Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
| Run User | MKD-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
82.2%
Excellent
|
80% 137 Pts
|
56% 448 Pts
|
32% 518 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 380X-$120
Asus(1043 04F5) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.300.2511.1001
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
37%
Below average
|
35% 50.8 fps
|
41% 50.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
76.7%
Very good
|
87% 393 MB/s
|
94% 29.5 MB/s
|
85% 150 MB/s
|
|
|
52.5%
Above average
|
69% 91.5 MB/s
|
43% 0.34 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GB-$35
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1867 MHz
|
61.4%
Good
|
59% 20.8 GB/s
|
53% 18.5 GB/s
|
78% 51.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8P67 EVO Builds (Compare 599 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8P67 EVO - $150
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 236x |
| Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 127x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $191Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 79x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 44x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 39x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 30x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $666 |