Gigabyte GA-785GMT-USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics49.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-785GMT-USB3  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100914
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateAug 24 '16 at 22:29
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Memory 83.6
1-Core 50.1
2-Core 98.1
50% 77.3 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 264
26% 215 Pts
64-Core 264
16% 264 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.0
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49.7% Average
Lighting 61.1
Reflection 55.6
Parallax 77.1
50% 64.6 fps
MRender 51.7
Gravity 53.6
Splatting 71.7
50% 59 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.2% Good
Read 256
Write 183
Mixed 193
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 22.7
117% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 98.5
DQ Mixed 61
61% 99.3 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 124%
Dell Portable 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 9009
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 118
Write 132
Mixed 116
159% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.94
4K Mixed 0.32
79% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
32.3% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 12.4
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 7.5
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-785GMT-USB3 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-785GMT-USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $236
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback