Asrock IMB-V1000

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock IMB-V1000  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '19 at 13:03
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B Vega Gfx
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 71.2
1-Core 114
2-Core 234
76% 140 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 626
67% 532 Pts
64-Core 622
38% 622 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 11 Graphics
ASRock(1849 15DD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 21.3
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 26.8
17% 21.9 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 22.5
Splatting 22
16% 18.7 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin SSD 256GB
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1112A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 262 265 285 285 286 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 474
Write 273
Mixed 254
SusWrite 272
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 35.2
118% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 156
124% 176 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 129%
General UDisk 16GB
15GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 8 8.3 8.4 8.4 8.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
5.11% Terrible
Read 13
Write 8.3
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 8.1
11% 8.48 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.11%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax GSJF62F-DA---------- 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.7% Good
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 20.7
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 19.9
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical IMB-V1000 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock IMB-V1000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback