Asus X99-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics82.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '19 at 03:55
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 85.3
1-Core 119
2-Core 234
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 709
70% 570 Pts
64-Core 866
54% 866 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Gigabyte(1458 36B7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.4% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 114
Parallax 112
85% 110 fps
MRender 93.9
Gravity 100
Splatting 88.7
77% 94.2 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,980
Write 4,643
Mixed 4,552
986% 4,392 MB/s
4K Read 356
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 197
881% 241 MB/s
DQ Read 752
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 523
393% 536 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
42GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 245 86 66 65 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 463
Mixed 424
SusWrite 154
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 45.4
149% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 231
207% 314 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 91%
Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
14GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 483
Write 469
Mixed 405
101% 452 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 73.1
4K Mixed 45.1
150% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 352
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60
3TB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 152 153 143 157 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 139
Write 144
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 150
80% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC98
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 115 118 112 118 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 106
Write 104
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 114
65% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
81% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GB-$130
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM 2400 MHz clocked @ 2448 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 42
MC Mixed 37.1
112% 39.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 21.9
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 102%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 1,987 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $744
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback