Asrock X58 Extreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsrock X58 Extreme  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110425
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 21 '19 at 02:19
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3680-$180
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 97.2
1-Core 88.5
2-Core 170
72% 118 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 538
54% 441 Pts
64-Core 652
40% 652 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5850
AMD(1002 0B00) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 22.6
Reflection 13.1
Parallax 20.2
18% 18.6 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 16.8
Splatting 16.7
12% 14.9 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
233GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 145 117 150 98 156 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63% Good
Read 248
Write 217
Mixed 218
SusWrite 129
46% 203 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 59
4K Mixed 41.5
126% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 36
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 44
55% 91.3 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 63%
Great: 126%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
49GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 58 48 60 44 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 85
Write 87.5
Mixed 59
SusWrite 55.3
53% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 51%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 712GB
153GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 210 168 215 154 273 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
129% Outstanding
Read 254
Write 222
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 195
137% 188 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1.3
400% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 129%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
58.5% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 21.6
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 14.6
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 49.4
81% 49.4 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 Extreme Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock X58 Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $207
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback