Asrock X399 Phantom Gaming 6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics52.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X399 Phantom Gaming 6  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181115
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 21 '19 at 01:50
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2920X
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 54.5
1-Core 70
2-Core 140
50% 88.3 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 762
57% 516 Pts
64-Core 2,072
128% 2,072 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.1.1
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.4% Above average
Lighting 62.1
Reflection 64.3
Parallax 61.2
51% 62.5 fps
MRender 73.5
Gravity 75.8
Splatting 59.3
56% 69.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$40
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 950 1032 407 216 212 215 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1344
Write 990
Mixed 863
SusWrite 505
206% 926 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 54.2
183% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 761
DQ Write 717
DQ Mixed 584
481% 688 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 174%
Great: 257%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
929GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 194 197 196 194 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 119
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 195
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 110%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-017.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
76.4% Very good
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 28.2
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 18.8
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 Phantom Gaming 6 Builds (Compare 229 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Phantom Gaming 6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $1,156
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback