Asrock X399 Phantom Gaming 6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics61.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X399 Phantom Gaming 6  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '19 at 21:27
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2920X
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 58.1
1-Core 128
2-Core 245
76% 144 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 894
85% 702 Pts
64-Core 2060
128% 2060 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.1.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.6% Good
Lighting 77.1
Reflection 76.5
Parallax 92.6
63% 82.1 fps
MRender 77.4
Gravity 79.9
Splatting 63.3
59% 73.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$40
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 982 1036 552 216 214 217 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 1,964
Write 1,007
Mixed 988
SusWrite 536
248% 1,124 MB/s
4K Read 59.2
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 77.5
258% 89.3 MB/s
DQ Read 816
DQ Write 924
DQ Mixed 630
541% 790 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 230%
Great: 257%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
929GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 195 195 196 197 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 205
Write 196
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 196
124% 170 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 115%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-017.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
76.2% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 27.5
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 18.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 Phantom Gaming 6 Builds (Compare 229 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Phantom Gaming 6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $1,156
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback