Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DANA_MB
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 20 '19 at 20:58
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 88.2
1-Core 127
2-Core 253
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 706
72% 580 Pts
64-Core 818
51% 818 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2001) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9901
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Lighting 64.2
Reflection 66
Parallax 57.5
52% 62.6 fps
MRender 66
Gravity 56.3
Splatting 58.7
49% 60.3 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D256 256GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C480903
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 267 229 258 243 237 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 1,264
Write 1,034
Mixed 866
SusWrite 247
190% 853 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 99.4
4K Mixed 61.6
194% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 772
DQ Write 653
DQ Mixed 597
479% 674 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 158%
Great: 209%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 126 126 124 126 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 110
Write 126
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 124
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
81.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 22.7
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 26.1
76% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback