Asrock 970DE3/U3S3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics32.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970DE3/U3S3  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '16 at 19:11
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 76.5
1-Core 67
2-Core 128
55% 90.3 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 274
31% 244 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Gainward(10B0 1184) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7254
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.6% Below average
Lighting 39.3
Reflection 35.2
Parallax 49.3
32% 41.3 fps
MRender 48.9
Gravity 45
Splatting 32.8
34% 42.2 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 366
Write 224
Mixed 242
61% 278 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 14.9
84% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 33.4
DQ Write 97
DQ Mixed 15.3
26% 48.6 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 118%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 128
Write 140
Mixed 110
94% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 2.04
4K Mixed 0.28
96% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77%
Great: 83%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46
124GB free
Firmware: 4.AA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 69.7
Write 43.5
Mixed 53.3
42% 55.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.31
87% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-8500CL7-4GBRL00 F3-8500CL7-4GBRL00 8GB
333, 333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.5% Poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6
18% 6.33 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.3
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970DE3/U3S3 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 970DE3/U3S3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $263
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback