Lenovo 24661N8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemLenovo 24661N8  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 24661N8
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '19 at 23:23
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 79.8
1-Core 66.8
2-Core 117
55% 88 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 161
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21F7) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Lighting 3.63
Reflection 4.85
Parallax 2.53
3% 3.67 fps
MRender 4.43
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 6.96
4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK10D7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 124 70 72 71 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 456
Write 267
Mixed 319
SusWrite 101
63% 286 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 23.8
92% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 183
168% 256 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8C-PB Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46.8% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 14.3
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 80.9
50% 80.9 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback