| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | HP 870-119 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | HP 828A |
| Memory | 11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160919 |
| Uptime | 2.7 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 19 '19 at 15:02 |
| Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
78.6%
Very good
|
71% 121 Pts
|
61% 503 Pts
|
40% 640 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2327 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35
|
102%
Outstanding
|
108% 129 fps
|
91% 112 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sandisk SD7SB6S-256G-1006 256GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4120006
|
387% 1866 MB/s
|
1,042% 230 MB/s
| ||
|
|
103% 140 MB/s
|
146% 1 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
67.9%
Good
|
69% 24.1 GB/s
|
56% 19.4 GB/s
|
59% 67.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 870-119 Builds (Compare 76 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP 870-119
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 75x |
| Core i7-6700TIntelBench 70%, 9,225 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 42x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 6x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $378 |