Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3050 14,457 User benchmarks, average bench 19% ¯¯¯¯¯¯SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	Memory 48.1 1-Core 20.9 2-Core 40.8 25% 36.6 Pts	4-Core 42.3 8-Core 40.4 6% 41.3 Pts	64-Core 41.7 3% 41.7 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 27%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.88% Terrible	Lighting 0.03 Reflection 3.12 Parallax 2.41 0% 1.85 fps	MRender 3.14 Gravity 1.67 Splatting 4.09 2% 2.97 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.88% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HD401LJ 400GB 1,767 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 281GB free (System drive) Firmware: ZZ100-15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 43 41 40 43 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	25.4% Poor	Read 46.4 Write 43.9 Mixed 34.1 SusWrite 41.6 31% 41.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 42%
USB DISK Pro 8GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 7GB free, PID 3623 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.3 4.3 4 4.3 4.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	3.65% Terrible	Read 10.7 Write 2.2 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 4.2 6% 5.32 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.65% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT51264BF160B.C16F 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1600, 65535 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	18.4% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 8.3 MC Mixed 6 19% 6.57 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 3.7 11% 3.83 GB/s	Latency 168 24% 168 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 25%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16