Dell Latitude E6530

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Latitude E6530  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 07Y85M
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180221
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateMar 16 '19 at 15:03
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3340M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 82.7
1-Core 70.9
2-Core 143
60% 98.7 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 217
29% 215 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Dell(1028 0535) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
4.07% Terrible
Lighting 4.53
Reflection 4.35
Parallax 3.09
4% 3.99 fps
MRender 5.38
Gravity 2.57
Splatting 8.57
5% 5.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.07%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM841 2.5" 7mm 128GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM01D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 209 216 220 213 226 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 443
Write 325
Mixed 212
SusWrite 224
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 22.8
79% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 124
148% 258 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 99%
Toshiba MK5056GSY 500GB-$106
433GB free
Firmware: LH003C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 98 102 102 100 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 94.5
Write 93
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 101
58% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 56%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-040.A01G Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.7% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 14.8
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6530 Builds (Compare 529 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6530

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $248
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback