Gigabyte GA-H170M-D3H DDR3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemGigabyte H170M-D3H DDR3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H170M-D3H DDR3-CF  (all builds)
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 16 '19 at 01:53
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 75
2-Core 207
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 311
42% 311 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.1% Average
Lighting 60.3
Reflection 66.5
Parallax 57.3
49% 61.4 fps
MRender 72.3
Gravity 58.9
Splatting 52.2
49% 61.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6639
Write 5746
Mixed 6,111
1,375% 6,165 MB/s
4K Read 527
4K Write 491
4K Mixed 498
1,697% 505 MB/s
DQ Read 1,303
DQ Write 1185
DQ Mixed 1,069
850% 1,186 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 125%
Adata XPG SX8200 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$80
53GB free
Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,179
Write 1,128
Mixed 1,000
315% 1,436 MB/s
4K Read 68
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 93.3
319% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 826
DQ Write 1,086
DQ Mixed 645
573% 852 MB/s
Poor: 104% Great: 241%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
668GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 201 201 201 201 202 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 211
Write 139
Mixed 87.4
SusWrite 198
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 117%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C11 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
68.8% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 22.1
68% 24 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 21.3
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H170M-D3H DDR3-CF Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H170M-D3H DDR3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $237
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback