Asus PRIME B350-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics39.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B350-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 15 '19 at 18:16
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 72.8
1-Core 110
2-Core 221
74% 134 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 892
79% 671 Pts
64-Core 1226
76% 1226 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1361 MHz, MLim: 2095 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.3.1
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.5% Below average
Lighting 44.8
Reflection 63.8
Parallax 64.6
36% 57.7 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 48.2
Splatting 53.3
45% 55.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mtfddak240mbb-1ae1za 00AJ381 00AJ384IBM 240GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MB2B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 274 270 273 275 269 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 329
Write 329
Mixed 273
SusWrite 276
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 28.6
98% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 194
176% 267 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 79%
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$60
119GB free
Firmware: EXM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 82 81 80 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 472
Write 81.8
Mixed 132
SusWrite 82
42% 192 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 5.5
59% 14 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSC.16FBR 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 27.8
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 32.1
SC Mixed 26.7
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 95.1
42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B350-PLUS Builds (Compare 4,324 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B350-PLUS - $92

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $443
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback