Asus PRIME X370-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X370-A  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 14 '19 at 20:29
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 74
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 203
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 719
65% 549 Pts
64-Core 892
55% 892 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
Gigabyte(1458 2553) 2GB
CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.1.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
24.1% Poor
Lighting 29.1
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 35.1
24% 31.8 fps
MRender 27
Gravity 24.6
Splatting 36.6
25% 29.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 636 314 314 311 313 313 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 2276
Write 1,473
Mixed 1,252
SusWrite 367
297% 1,342 MB/s
4K Read 59.4
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 72.3
276% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 929
DQ Write 862
DQ Mixed 977
711% 923 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 238%
Great: 280%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
176GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 100 102 103 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 90.3
Write 84.3
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 102
59% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 74%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
152GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 58 58 58 59 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 103
Write 96.8
Mixed 85.8
SusWrite 57.6
64% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 67%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
756GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 115 115 115 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 124
Write 112
Mixed 104
SusWrite 115
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
320GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 138 135 140 140 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 151
Write 109
Mixed 71
SusWrite 139
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 112%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
281GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 89 89 88 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 83.7
Write 86.5
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 88.6
57% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 84%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB
2TB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 92 92 92 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 97.3
Write 93.5
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 91.5
118% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.8
235% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
AMD R744G2606U1S 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz
Performing below potential (94th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
101% Outstanding
MC Read 41.6
MC Write 37.9
MC Mixed 33.4
108% 37.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 27.4
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X370-A Builds (Compare 443 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $482
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback