Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Pro3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '19 at 08:29
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 68.2
2-Core 137
59% 96.6 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 302
34% 267 Pts
64-Core 314
19% 314 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 906 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.59
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 19.4
Reflection 15
Parallax 23.2
16% 19.2 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 14
Splatting 21.1
17% 20.5 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 18%
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Asus(1043 84F0) 2GB
CLim: 1433 MHz, MLim: 1302 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.59
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Lighting 18
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 85.8
15% 39.1 fps
MRender 16.9
Gravity 14
Splatting 20.7
14% 17.2 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 274 273 246 268 268 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 311
Write 276
Mixed 244
SusWrite 262
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 31.2
112% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 38
DQ Write 69.5
DQ Mixed 49.6
39% 52.4 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 128%
Toshiba MK5075GSX 500GB-$127
373GB free
Firmware: GT00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 45 38 44 46 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 49.9
Write 19.2
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 43
23% 31.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLT8G3D21BCT1.16FN Corsair CMV8GX3M1C1600C11 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
46.4% Average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 17.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 11
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 789 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback