Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Pro3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '19 at 08:25
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 84.9
1-Core 68.2
2-Core 134
59% 95.8 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 309
33% 264 Pts
64-Core 314
19% 314 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 906 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.59
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 19.3
Reflection 5.46
Parallax 46.9
16% 23.9 fps
MRender 26.3
Gravity 10.8
Splatting 27
18% 21.4 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 18%
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Asus(1043 84F0) 2GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1302 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.59
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
14% Very poor
Lighting 17
Reflection 14.1
Parallax 16.5
14% 15.9 fps
MRender 20.8
Gravity 17.2
Splatting 14.9
14% 17.6 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 283 277 280 273 234 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 276
Write 311
Mixed 282
SusWrite 272
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 46.9
4K Mixed 30.9
108% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 33.7
DQ Write 78.3
DQ Mixed 50
40% 54 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 128%
Toshiba MK5075GSX 500GB-$127
373GB free
Firmware: GT00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 45 40 39 41 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 56.4
Write 24.5
Mixed 14.1
SusWrite 40.6
25% 33.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLT8G3D21BCT1.16FN Corsair CMV8GX3M1C1600C11 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
46.4% Average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 16.8
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11.8
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 789 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback