HP p6-2024esm

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p6-2024esm  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2ACF
Memory3.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120118
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 09 '19 at 19:41
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-3420 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Memory 62.2
1-Core 42.5
2-Core 74.7
39% 59.8 Pts
4-Core 78.5
8-Core 67.7
10% 73.1 Pts
64-Core 79.4
5% 79.4 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 45%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK2046GSX 200GB
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LB013M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 39 40 43 36 43 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 51.5
Write 44
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 38.3
29% 39.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
80% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 29%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
553GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 114 113 115 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 114
Write 118
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 114
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT125U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.4% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 9
26% 9.23 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.4
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback