TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus Z87-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z87-K  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131025
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateMar 09 '19 at 16:46
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 104
2-Core 212
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 402
54% 403 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 78.6%
 Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2825) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.3% Below average
Lighting 37.1
Reflection 38.4
Parallax 52.3
30% 42.6 fps
MRender 53.7
Gravity 46.4
Splatting 36.4
36% 45.5 fps
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 32.3%
 Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$135
544GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 328 365 382 369 356 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 423
Write 320
Mixed 284
SusWrite 357
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 38.4
133% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 286
234% 332 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑
This bench: 95.8%
 Great: 133%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
91GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 51 50 51 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 86
Write 81.5
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 50.2
50% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 39.2%
 Great: 51%
HGST HTS 541010A9E680 1TB
44GB free, PID 6388
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 35 37 38 38 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 36
Write 36
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 36.8
47% 34.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 17.6%
 Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C8 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.7% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 9.2
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.2
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 31.7%
 Great: 63%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z87-K Builds (Compare 2,146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus Z87-K - $134

CPU
Core i5-4670KIntel  $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples515x
Core i7-4770KIntel  $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples442x
Core i7-4770Intel  $65Bench 70%, 176,321 samples361x
GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples169x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples141x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples140x
SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples79x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples59x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples55x
RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples84x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples63x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples50x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $412
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback