Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181105
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 08 '19 at 17:41
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 97.5
1-Core 165
2-Core 326
107% 196 Pts
4-Core 632
8-Core 1,030
102% 831 Pts
64-Core 1,348
84% 1,348 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 108%
Great: 100%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Asus(1043 872F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.41% Terrible
Lighting 8.7
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 8.81
7% 10.1 fps
MRender 13.4
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 17.4
11% 12.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.41%
Great: 7%
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 3604) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 3002 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.1% Below average
Lighting 30.9
Reflection 54.7
Parallax 44.3
25% 43.3 fps
MRender 67.8
Gravity 47.3
Splatting 61.7
48% 58.9 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer Z280 480G 480GB
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP021PF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 860 892 848 616 240 244 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,140
Write 1078
Mixed 828
SusWrite 616
205% 916 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 55.4
196% 72 MB/s
DQ Read 1,064
DQ Write 685
DQ Mixed 512
480% 754 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 183%
Great: 232%
Apacer Z280 480G 480GB
53GB free
Firmware: AP021PF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 958
Write 1,072
Mixed 522
189% 851 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 43.7
177% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 797
DQ Write 761
DQ Mixed 449
428% 669 MB/s
Poor: 113% Great: 232%
Apacer AST680S 480GB
126GB free
Firmware: AP122PD0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 356 152 175 175 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 476
Mixed 384
SusWrite 249
90% 403 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 41.3
157% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 193
186% 293 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 105%
Intel 540s Series 240GB
67GB free
Firmware: LSF041C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 109 101 102 103 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 468
Write 441
Mixed 236
SusWrite 120
70% 316 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 39.5
152% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 235
180% 244 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 90%
Hitachi HTS541010A7E630 1TB
604GB free
Firmware: SE0OA4A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 92 93 92 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 85
Write 86.3
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 92.9
51% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 60%
Hitachi HTS541010A7E630 1TB
425GB free
Firmware: SE0OA4A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 91 91 90 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 98
Write 102
Mixed 20
SusWrite 91.1
56% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer 78.CAGN4.4020B 78.CAGN4.4090B 78.CAGN4.4020B 78.CAGN4.4090B 32GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
110% Outstanding
MC Read 42.1
MC Write 42.3
MC Mixed 32.5
111% 39 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 42
SC Mixed 32.9
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 48.5
83% 48.5 ns
Poor: 103%
This bench: 110%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS X HERO Builds (Compare 3,688 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $1,116
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback