Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 08 '19 at 15:39
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$188
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 79.8
2-Core 153
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 328
38% 294 Pts
64-Core 385
24% 385 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4944
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.57% Terrible
Lighting 1.63
Reflection 2.81
Parallax 1.66
1% 2.03 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 3.61
2% 2.34 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.57%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
297GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 477 464 480 426 287 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 418
Mixed 412
SusWrite 432
97% 429 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 98
4K Mixed 58.2
194% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 360
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 121%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
903GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 189 180 183 189 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 179
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 184
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 108%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$103
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
72% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 22.9
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 21
62% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 4,038 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 - $221

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback