Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190125
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 08 '19 at 10:50
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 84.8
1-Core 125
2-Core 249
85% 153 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 865
82% 678 Pts
64-Core 1,318
82% 1,318 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1F02) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 120
Parallax 135
106% 128 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 126
Splatting 99
105% 133 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 851 643 303 302 304 304 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,848
Write 1,468
Mixed 582
SusWrite 451
241% 1,088 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 51.3
193% 71.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,031
DQ Write 932
DQ Mixed 659
583% 874 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 204%
Great: 236%
Kingston RBU-SC400S37256G 256GB
116GB free
Firmware: KD1ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 236 223 219 223 225 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 397
Write 287
Mixed 286
SusWrite 226
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 37.3
148% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 146
137% 210 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 90%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
87GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 410 475 477 480 475 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 480
Mixed 400
SusWrite 448
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 62.9
209% 74.2 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 370
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 129%
Great: 134%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
562GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 85 86 86 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 100
Write 102
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 85.7
116% 87 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 63%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
12GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 2.2 9.9 9.4 9.7 9.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 8.5
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 7
20% 17.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 3.6
232% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 40.1
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 34.7
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 26.2
SC Write 39.6
SC Mixed 31
92% 32.3 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 102%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,659 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $661
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback