Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190125
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 08 '19 at 10:39
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 85.2
1-Core 125
2-Core 249
85% 153 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 861
82% 676 Pts
64-Core 1,324
82% 1,324 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1F02) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 122
Parallax 135
107% 129 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 126
Splatting 99.9
106% 135 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1351 309 310 311 311 310 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1901
Write 1,453
Mixed 546
SusWrite 484
242% 1,096 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 40.6
185% 70.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1006
DQ Write 954
DQ Mixed 661
584% 874 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 204%
Great: 236%
Kingston RBU-SC400S37256G 256GB
116GB free
Firmware: KD1ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 214 223 226 223 224 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 394
Write 297
Mixed 283
SusWrite 225
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 41.3
154% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 160
152% 237 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 90%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
87GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 480 477 464 438 427 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 488
Mixed 396
SusWrite 460
104% 463 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 64.2
215% 76.1 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 371
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 132%
Great: 134%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
562GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 84 86 86 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 102
Write 101
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 85.3
115% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 63%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
12GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 1.5 8 9.5 9 2.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 36.8
Write 12.5
Mixed 19
SusWrite 5.3
21% 18.4 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 3.7
236% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 16%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 35.1
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 39
SC Mixed 30.8
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 103%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,636 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $678
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback