Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180426
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 07 '19 at 19:53
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 106
2-Core 213
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 807
74% 618 Pts
64-Core 1,320
82% 1,320 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 203
Reflection 218
Parallax 222
165% 214 fps
MRender 243
Gravity 203
Splatting 136
153% 194 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 149%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$135
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 441 185 166 165 162 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 441
Write 428
Mixed 360
SusWrite 261
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 96.6
4K Mixed 41.1
152% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 276
231% 336 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
586GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2234 2241 2241 2238 2237 2251 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
345% Outstanding
Read 2,446
Write 2,229
Mixed 1,432
SusWrite 2,240
469% 2,087 MB/s
4K Read 52.9
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 71.5
238% 83.2 MB/s
DQ Read 963
DQ Write 663
DQ Mixed 888
643% 838 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 345%
Great: 425%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
248GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 416 398 408 422 405 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 481
Mixed 356
SusWrite 421
99% 438 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 96.1
4K Mixed 53.1
181% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 235
213% 325 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 118%
Great: 126%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
440GB free
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 457 462 458 397 324 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 508
Write 357
Mixed 358
SusWrite 425
92% 412 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 29.8
110% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 91.1
DQ Mixed 153
117% 162 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.6% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 26.3
80% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 28.2
SC Mixed 22.9
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,443 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $531
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback