Biostar TA970

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar TA970  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140807
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '19 at 23:20
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 86.6
1-Core 74.3
2-Core 136
61% 99.1 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 389
38% 314 Pts
64-Core 416
26% 416 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.6% Above average
Lighting 65.1
Reflection 71.6
Parallax 86
53% 74.2 fps
MRender 71.3
Gravity 62.6
Splatting 57.7
52% 63.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 142 141 142 142 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 436
Write 405
Mixed 320
SusWrite 159
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 45
152% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 148
120% 168 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 108%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
360GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 232 360 400 402 377 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 452
Write 423
Mixed 408
SusWrite 338
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 49.6
164% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 61.2
71% 125 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 133%
Hitachi Travelstar 5K750 750GB-$52
699GB free
Firmware: JE4OA50A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 81 81 82 80 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 76.5
Write 85.2
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 80.8
52% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
667, 667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
44% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 15.3
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 11.8
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 44%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TA970 Builds (Compare 177 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar TA970 - $125

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $352
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback