Asus P5QC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics8.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P5QC  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '15 at 14:09
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 46.2
2-Core 94.8
32% 70.5 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 185
25% 186 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 37% Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250
POV(1ACC 0925) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4052
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
8.53% Terrible
Lighting 11.8
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 4.03
10% 8.78 fps
MRender 8.95
Gravity 8.47
Splatting 6.83
6% 8.08 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.53%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 185
Write 106
Mixed 126
31% 139 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 16.4
76% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 35.9
49% 90.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 61%
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$39
582GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 110
Write 111
Mixed 82.1
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.21
95% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 86%
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$39
419GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
64% Good
Read 113
Write 110
Mixed 81.1
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 2.35
4K Mixed 0.22
83% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64%
Great: 86%
ST2000DL 001-9VT156 2TB
485GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 104
Write 92.1
Mixed 32.7
90% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.95
4K Mixed 0.16
40% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 38%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB
323GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 106
Write 84.8
Mixed 17.7
78% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.26
38% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 55%
Typical P5QC Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5QC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback