Hp-pavilion KX554AA-AKB m9363.cs

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHp-pavilion KX554AA-AKB m9363.cs  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON Benicia
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080616
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 16 '16 at 22:28
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
42.6% Average
Memory 67.2
1-Core 27.5
2-Core 52.7
35% 49.1 Pts
4-Core 107
8-Core 108
14% 107 Pts
64-Core 105
6% 105 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
Zotac(19DA 1227) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6510
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 20.2
Parallax 15.7
14% 17.8 fps
MRender 24.7
Gravity 18.4
Splatting 20.6
17% 21.2 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$25
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 75.9
Write 74.8
Mixed 70.8
56% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.22
62% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 69%
Generic USB CF Reader 4GB
2GB free, PID null
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 26.1
Write 16.9
Mixed 21.2
26% 21.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.89
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 1.77
130% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 4.6
15% 5.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 4.8
13% 4.6 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KX554AA-AKB m9363.cs Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion KX554AA-AKB m9363.cs

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $127
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback