Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 16 '16 at 05:37
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Memory 96.5
1-Core 139
2-Core 271
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 764
78% 633 Pts
64-Core 767
48% 767 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6881
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Lighting 146
Reflection 159
Parallax 136
119% 147 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 137
Splatting 117
102% 125 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 111%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
260GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 2,170
Write 1,284
Mixed 1,289
349% 1,581 MB/s
4K Read 52.3
4K Write 232
4K Mixed 61.6
281% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 971
DQ Write 393
DQ Mixed 235
292% 533 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 280%
Great: 283%
Seagate ST5000NM0024-1HT170 5TB
4TB free
Firmware: SN02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 166
Mixed 96.1
109% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.32
125% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 121%
Seagate ST4000LM016-1N2170 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0003 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 89.8
Write 84.7
Mixed 16.2
46% 63.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 5.22
4K Mixed 0.62
190% 2.14 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 66%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$270
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 238
Mixed 98.1
128% 174 MB/s
4K Read 3.23
4K Write 2.62
4K Mixed 0.25
212% 2.04 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 121%
Great: 118%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
370GB free
Firmware: 2BC10006 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 104
Write 94.5
Mixed 33.2
57% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.27
78% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 70%
Seagate BACKUP+ 1TB
691GB free, PID ab24
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 95
Write 102
Mixed 76
116% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.28
4K Mixed 0.18
85% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 38.2
MC Mixed 30.1
99% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 40.3
SC Mixed 29.7
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 52.2
77% 52.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170X-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 1,366 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 5 - $167

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $757
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback