TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Medionpc MS-7728

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics3.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMedionpc MS-7728  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDIONPC MS-7728
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111222
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 03 '19 at 17:46
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2320-$165
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 75.6
2-Core 147
51% 111 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 155
31% 210 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 50% Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 530
MSI(1462 230A) 1GB
CLim: 699 MHz, MLim: 396 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.46% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 5.04
Parallax 3.53
4% 4.29 fps
MRender 5.67
Gravity 4.23
Splatting 3
3% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 3.46%
 Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 228
Write 35.2
Mixed 63.2
23% 109 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 11.6
60% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 25.2
DQ Write 33
DQ Mixed 23.4
19% 27.2 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
83GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 128
Write 128
Mixed 21.7
67% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
158% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 107%
ASMT 2105 1TB
128GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 35.5
Write 28.2
Mixed 28.8
38% 30.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 79%
ASMT 2115 1TB
91GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 60.2
Write 61.3
Mixed 36.3
66% 52.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 189%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
825GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 2.4 2.5 2.3 2.4 3.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.78% Terrible
Read 35.2
Write 35
Mixed 30
SusWrite 2.6
33% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑
This bench: 9.78%
 Great: 51%
Hitachi HDS721010DLE630 1TB
92GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 36.2
Write 35.5
Mixed 31
SusWrite 17.6
40% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑
This bench: 14.8%
 Great: 56%
Seagate Expansion+ Desk 4TB
1TB free, PID 3323
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 20 20 20 20 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 28.5
Write 30.2
Mixed 12.4
SusWrite 19.4
30% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.5
166% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑
This bench: 21.7%
 Great: 72%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MS-7728 Builds (Compare 554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Medionpc MS-7728

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel  $199Bench 67%, 185,630 samples236x
Core i5-2320Intel  $165Bench 64%, 38,345 samples166x
Core i3-2120Intel  $75Bench 51%, 77,810 samples29x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples77x
GTX 550-TiNvidia  $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples60x
GTX 560Nvidia  $180Bench 14%, 23,273 samples37x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples23x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples22x
MX500 1TBCrucial  $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples14x
RAM
M2F4G64CB8HB5N-CG 8GBNanyaBench 49%, 792 samples58x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 4GBSamsungBench 45%, 800 samples52x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 8GBSamsungBench 49%, 768 samples27x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $286
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback