PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 36.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 80.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20160324 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 03 '19 at 14:07 |
Run Duration | 259 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
66.6%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.5.1
|
36.5%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk Extreme II 240GB-$110
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R131
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 160 151 153 141 142 MB/s
|
80.9%
Excellent
|
|||
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB
82GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 70 71 72 71 MB/s
|
40.8%
Average
|
|||
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
336GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 96 98 98 98 MB/s
|
53.3%
Above average
|
|||
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB
114GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 70 72 72 72 MB/s
|
39%
Below average
|
|||
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB
102GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 53 55 55 54 MB/s
|
33.5%
Below average
|
|||
ITE Disk Array 2 300GB
99GB free
Firmware: BAJ4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 22 MB/s
|
18.5%
Very poor
|
|||
ITE Disk Array 3 204GB
14GB free
Firmware: YAR4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
|
16.9%
Very poor
|
|||
ITE Disk Array 0 160GB
82GB free
Firmware: TM10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
|
22.1%
Poor
|
|||
ITE Disk Array 1 160GB
64GB free
Firmware: 9.51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
|
14.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 Team-Elite-1600 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
48.2%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 428x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 390x |
FX-8320AMD $75Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 204x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 108x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 67x |
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 66x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $377 |