Asus H81M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H81M-A  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '19 at 12:54
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$51
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 110
2-Core 209
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 254
43% 305 Pts
64-Core 390
24% 390 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Gigabyte(1458 3553) 1GB
CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
9.24% Terrible
Lighting 10.5
Reflection 9.62
Parallax 12
8% 10.7 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 13.2
11% 12.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.24%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 390 398 409 412 424 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 386
Write 360
Mixed 358
SusWrite 401
85% 376 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 46.3
161% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 298
221% 287 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 102%
Great: 134%
WD Green 500GB (2012)
27GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 80 91 96 90 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 26.2
Write 58.5
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 87.4
48% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 79%
2GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
0.52% Terrible
Read 1.3
Write 0.3
Mixed 1
SusWrite 1.5
1% 1.02 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.52%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.2% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 13.2
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-A Builds (Compare 1,312 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-A - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $313
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback