MSI B350M MORTAR (MS-7A37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics63.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A37
MotherboardMSI B350M MORTAR (MS-7A37)  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190122
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 03 '19 at 05:02
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 73.4
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 180
67% 117 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 663
61% 512 Pts
64-Core 1,068
66% 1,068 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.17
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
63.1% Good
Lighting 74.4
Reflection 85.6
Parallax 75
61% 78.3 fps
MRender 86.5
Gravity 88.4
Splatting 76.7
68% 83.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 498 276 277 278 277 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,776
Write 1,207
Mixed 1,076
SusWrite 289
241% 1087 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 66.7
207% 73.5 MB/s
DQ Read 821
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 273
287% 486 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 180%
Great: 244%
Toshiba THNSNA480GESC 480GB
178GB free
Firmware: SBFB12.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 260 184 266 446 448 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 202
Write 105
Mixed 88.7
SusWrite 339
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 19.2
4K Mixed 10.7
48% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 14.3
DQ Write 15.6
DQ Mixed 14.8
11% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 89%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
282GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 104 104 104 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
60% Good
Read 105
Write 104
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 104
70% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 60%
Great: 60%
Apple HDD HTS545050A7E362 500GB
208GB free
Firmware: GG2AB990
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 93 93 94 94 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 95.2
Write 96.7
Mixed 34
SusWrite 93.5
58% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 61%
Toshiba MD04ACA200 2TB
997GB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 152 152 152 151 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 152
Write 152
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 152
95% 131 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
301% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 99%
Verbatim STORE N GO 32GB
30GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 6.9 7.8 8 7.9 7.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
6% Terrible
Read 20
Write 2
Mixed 6
SusWrite 7.3
10% 8.82 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 31.7
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 25.3
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 93.8
43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B350M MORTAR (MS-7A37) Builds (Compare 732 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B350M MORTAR (MS-7A37)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $302
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback