Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime6.5 Days
Run DateMar 02 '19 at 20:23
Run Duration350 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 50.7
2-Core 120
53% 84.8 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 322
34% 272 Pts
64-Core 324
20% 324 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Gigabyte(1458 362C) 3GB
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.1% Average
Lighting 60.4
Reflection 59.9
Parallax 74.4
49% 64.9 fps
MRender 68.9
Gravity 69.7
Splatting 45.8
49% 61.4 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 370 361 377 374 375 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 412
Write 375
Mixed 359
SusWrite 370
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 69.2
4K Mixed 42.9
141% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 71.1
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 48.2
61% 105 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 133%
Ocz-soli D3 120GB
39GB free
Firmware: 2.11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 72 83 78 79 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 136
Write 102
Mixed 112
SusWrite 78.5
24% 107 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 25.1
100% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 95.3
76% 108 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 55%
WD WD1500AHFD-00RAR5 150GB
85GB free
Firmware: 20.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 46 46 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Read 54.2
Write 53.8
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 45.8
35% 47.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 47%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
339GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 86 89 90 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 51.2
Write 51
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 88.3
41% 55.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
43.5% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.1
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $689
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback