Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime6.5 Days
Run DateMar 02 '19 at 20:13
Run Duration355 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 62.2
2-Core 121
56% 88.9 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 325
33% 269 Pts
64-Core 314
19% 314 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Gigabyte(1458 362C) 3GB
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Lighting 70.6
Reflection 69.4
Parallax 92.7
58% 77.6 fps
MRender 79.6
Gravity 81.4
Splatting 52.2
56% 71.1 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 413 413 425 431 405 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 425
Write 445
Mixed 380
SusWrite 417
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 75.8
4K Mixed 42.8
151% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 15.1
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 21.1
45% 86 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 133%
Ocz-soli D3 120GB
39GB free
Firmware: 2.11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 91 93 95 95 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 180
Write 137
Mixed 128
SusWrite 93.8
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 70.9
4K Mixed 30.1
114% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 98.5
DQ Mixed 110
84% 114 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 55%
WD WD1500AHFD-00RAR5 150GB
85GB free
Firmware: 20.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 52 52 53 52 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 63
Write 63.7
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 52.9
40% 54.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
201% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 47%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
339GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 79 79 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 66
Write 63.3
Mixed 51
SusWrite 79.3
48% 64.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
43.5% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 12.2
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $689
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback