Asus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics58.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '19 at 07:54
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 159
2-Core 317
103% 189 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 1,016
90% 761 Pts
64-Core 1,494
92% 1,494 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (100th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (72 fps cap detected)
58.8% Above average
Lighting 72.4
Reflection 72.7
Parallax 62.1
59% 69 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 69.8
Splatting 72.8
58% 71.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 451
Write 451
Mixed 384
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 97.5
4K Mixed 39.9
147% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 328
254% 348 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
310GB free
Firmware: CC25
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 132
Write 101
Mixed 72.8
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
296GB free
Firmware: CC25
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 126
Write 99.9
Mixed 70.6
73% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
699GB free
Firmware: CC26
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 180
Write 137
Mixed 78.6
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
SEAGATE ST68022CF 8GB
7GB free, PID 06c1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8.3
Write 8.8
Mixed 7.3
10% 8.13 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
21% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 5%
Kingston HyperX Savage USB 3.1 512GB-$233
468GB free, PID 16b3
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 255
Write 50.1
Mixed 20.5
94% 108 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.2
146% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 98%
Kingston DT HyperX 3.0 126GB
118GB free, PID 162b
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 255
Write 108
Mixed 89.3
162% 151 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2.3
156% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GB-$74
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
77.4% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 23.1
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 24.6
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 1,116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $603
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback