Asus GRYPHON Z97

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics58% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus GRYPHON Z97  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151111
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 02 '19 at 05:05
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 98.7
2-Core 146
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 268
36% 267 Pts
64-Core 270
17% 270 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58% Above average
Lighting 70.8
Reflection 67.9
Parallax 58.2
58% 65.6 fps
MRender 72.8
Gravity 68.3
Splatting 73.1
59% 71.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier Pro SP920 128GB-$35
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 147 143 137 143 151 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 388
Write 90.3
Mixed 153
SusWrite 145
43% 194 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 15.9
69% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 55.3
75% 138 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53%
Great: 85%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
645GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 111 119 112 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 121
Write 120
Mixed 79
SusWrite 112
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 83%
External USB3.0 40GB
36GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 47 47 48 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
109% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 47.5
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 46.9
92% 82 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 23.3
4K Mixed 11.8
1,238% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 19.2
DQ Write 36.6
DQ Mixed 17.8
1,922% 24.5 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 109%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5471-025.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
55.5% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 17.6
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.7
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GRYPHON Z97 Builds (Compare 148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus GRYPHON Z97 - $176

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $942
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback