Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte AX370-Gaming K5
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '19 at 01:22
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 76.1
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 197
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 719
67% 556 Pts
64-Core 1,065
66% 1,065 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1420 MHz, MLim: 2140 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.2.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Lighting 76.6
Reflection 72.7
Parallax 102
62% 83.7 fps
MRender 72.4
Gravity 75.5
Splatting 58.2
55% 68.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 500GB-$99
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 396 397 388 400 405 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 489
Mixed 396
SusWrite 407
101% 451 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 97.5
4K Mixed 50.7
176% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 290
236% 335 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 116%
Great: 116%
SSD 60GB
40GB free
Firmware: S9FM02.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 67 75 76 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 494
Write 63.1
Mixed 131
SusWrite 77.4
41% 191 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 50.2
4K Mixed 10.6
77% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 86.6
DQ Mixed 7.6
33% 75.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 75%
Seagate ST33000650NS 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: NS00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 118 119 120 119 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 120
Write 121
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 120
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
781GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 143 143 143 142 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 164
Write 135
Mixed 95.4
SusWrite 143
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2666 C16 Series CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 2666 C16 Series CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
MC Read 37
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 30.9
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 27.4
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF Builds (Compare 617 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $597
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback