Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$175 12,658 User benchmarks, average bench 43% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	46.9% Average	Memory 67 1-Core 59.2 2-Core 109 48% 78.3 Pts	4-Core 158 8-Core 152 21% 155 Pts	64-Core 166 10% 166 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 500GB (2016)-$22 16,451 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 21 39 50 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 15.3 Write 20 Mixed 14 SusWrite 33.4 15% 20.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 34% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 114%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21 80,932 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 26GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 28 26 42 52 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	28% Poor	Read 60 Write 49 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 37.3 34% 45.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 61%
Innostor Ext. HDD 320GB 146 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 19GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 29 28 29 30 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 30.7 Write 28.7 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 28.7 37% 27.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5584-016.A 99U5584-012.A 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.8% Below average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 13.7 34% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 7.8 17% 6.07 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	80x
Radeon HD 8470DAMDBench 3%, 8,268 samples	29x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	29x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	14x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,567 samples	14x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 4,775 samples	11x

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $28