TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock X370 Gaming X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock X370 Gaming X  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '19 at 06:17
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 86.4
1-Core 113
2-Core 235
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 762
75% 615 Pts
64-Core 963
60% 963 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑
This bench: 86.7%
 Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
MSI(1462 3419) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1431 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.2.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.7% Good
Lighting 77.2
Reflection 74.2
Parallax 107
63% 86 fps
MRender 72.8
Gravity 77.9
Splatting 60
56% 70.2 fps
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 60.7%
 Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 560 322 322 322 322 311 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 2,000
Write 1,422
Mixed 810
SusWrite 360
254% 1,148 MB/s
4K Read 58.1
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 60.9
254% 95.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,046
DQ Write 949
DQ Mixed 720
616% 905 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑
This bench: 223%
 Great: 236%
Intel Pro 6000p NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$65
151GB free
Firmware: HP01 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 561 315 126 108 108 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 557
Write 544
Mixed 500
SusWrite 220
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 48
167% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 453
DQ Mixed 322
256% 352 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑
This bench: 104%
 Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown< BLS8G4D26BFSE.16FBD2 859< BLS8G4D26BFSE.16FE 16GB
3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 43.2
MC Write 38.8
MC Mixed 37.7
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 40.8
SC Mixed 32.9
97% 33.8 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 96% ↑
This bench: 110%
 Great: 108%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical X370 Gaming X Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming X

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD  $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples26x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD  $195Bench 71%, 66,470 samples24x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD  $190Bench 76%, 159,077 samples24x
GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples17x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples14x
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples13x
SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples9x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung  $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples9x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $55Bench 275%, 495,311 samples8x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples9x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples7x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $34Bench 84%, 287,720 samples7x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $444
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback