Asrock X370 Gaming X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock X370 Gaming X  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '19 at 15:32
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 116
2-Core 184
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 660
63% 522 Pts
64-Core 926
57% 926 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
MSI(1462 3419) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1431 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.1.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.8% Good
Lighting 77.1
Reflection 73
Parallax 94.3
63% 81.5 fps
MRender 72.9
Gravity 77.8
Splatting 61
57% 70.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 532 313 306 291 268 284 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 2,101
Write 1,370
Mixed 581
SusWrite 332
241% 1,096 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 57.7
233% 91.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1043
DQ Write 1,010
DQ Mixed 828
676% 960 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 221%
Great: 236%
Intel Pro 6000p NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$65
197GB free
Firmware: HP01 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 573 302 126 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 575
Write 574
Mixed 516
SusWrite 221
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 51.4
183% 71 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 465
DQ Mixed 324
260% 357 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 110%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown< BLS8G4D26BFSE.16FBD2 859< BLS8G4D26BFSE.16FE 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 33.1
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 30.4
88% 31 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 96%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Gaming X Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $444
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback