Dell XPS 8900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics88.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemDell XPS 8900  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0XJ8C4
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171210
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '19 at 19:45
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 114
2-Core 226
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 650
62% 515 Pts
64-Core 644
40% 644 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.2% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 118
Parallax 97.4
88% 108 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 122
Splatting 101
89% 109 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
252GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 319 323 301 308 316 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 432
Mixed 373
SusWrite 321
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 94.6
4K Mixed 52.9
177% 62.3 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 344
259% 346 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 108%
Great: 134%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
664GB free
Firmware: M0CR070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 320 359 366 402 420 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 424
Write 407
Mixed 355
SusWrite 370
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 93.6
4K Mixed 38.8
140% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 302
226% 302 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
162GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 124 127 125 126 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 116
Write 87.5
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 126
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A2 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A2 859B0000802C CT8G4DFD8213.C16FHP 859B0000802C CT8G4DFD8213.C16FHP 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 23.8
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 22.3
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 73%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8900 Builds (Compare 2,795 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback